Home Surveys Growth Inflation Money
interest rates
Markets Constitution Members About

 

GOVERNMENT DEBT and FISCAL POLICY  

This sections reviews the sovereign debt crisis and the various attempts to come to grips with it.
The fiscal policy of the euro zone, budgets and debts of the individual countries are surveyed.
 

IN THIS SECTION:

Sovereign debt crisis


Yield spreads & news
Problem countries

Some background
Budget deficits current and forecast
Fiscal Compact
Government debt: current and forecast
Unsustainable debt burden
Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt
Sovereign debt crisis: bailout funds
 
 

Background


From "no bailouts" to Fiscal Compact
EU's financial support package of May'10
European Financial Stability Facility/Stabilisation Mechanism
26-27 Oct'11 summit

8-9 Dec'11 summit



 


S U M M A R Y
Last updated  22 Feb'12  a.m.
 

Debt crisis eased. Yield spreads between German bonds and the bonds of most of the problem countries narrowed markedly in Jan-Feb'12. But spreads remain wide. The problem countries are finding it difficult to implement austerity measures in recessionary climate and against opposition from vested interests.

Sovereign debt crisis news:  bond yield spreads mostly narrow after Greek deal

22
Feb : Yield spreads narrowed further in Italy and Spain after Greek bailout approved.

19 Feb: Massive trade union protests against Spain's labour reforms.

15 Feb : Suggestions that approval of Greek bailout package may be delayed to EU summit of 2 Mar'12, awaiting proof of implementation of austerity measures by Greece.

Strong demand at Portuguese treasury bill auction with lower yields than in previous auction. Portuguese government claims major structural reforms well underway.

14 Feb : Further steep decline in Portuguese bond yields and spreads. Italy and Spain borrowed at significantly lower rates in successful auctions in spite Moody's downgrades.

13 Feb : Greek parliament approved austerity budget demanded by EU/IMF amid violent protests in the streets. Still required are written assurances from politicians that measures will be implemented after the elections pencilled in for Apr'12 as well as clarification about some of the austerity measures.

Portugal's adherence to its bailout programme to be reviewed by EU/IMF/ECB this week. Progress in structural reforms have been made (see below).

Moody's put France and Austria on negative downgrade watch, downgraded Italy, Spain, Portugal.

3 Feb: Euro zone finance ministers cancelled meeting which was to sign off on Greece's second EUR130bn bailout programme after Greek political parties refused to agree to new austerity measures demanded by the representatives of EU, ECB and IMF ("troika").


Yield spreads
narrow as confidence rises that sovereign debt crisis is under better control. Expected that banks will borrow substantial funds from ECB at 28 Feb 3yr loan offer.

2 Feb: Spanish government has presented tough proposals to restructure the banking system. Mergers are being encouraged. Banks are to reduce their real estate portfolios by putting properties on the market.

Italy's PM Monti
said he will force through labour market changes opposed by trade unions.

France and Italy held successful bond auctions at lower interest rates than a month earlier.

Bank of Ireland cut its 2012 growth forecast to 0.5% (from Oct'11 forecast of 1.8%)

                          Country details below 

 

10-yr Government bond yields

The euro zones sovereign debt crisis will end once the bond yields of the problem countries are back at affordable levels (or one or other country leaves the monetary union). This requires the budget deficits of the problem countries to shrink. The debt crisis reached its most acute phase so far in Nov'11 after the 26-27 Oct'11 summit failed to come up with credible solutions. The measures taken in Dec'11 by the ECB and by the EU summit calmed the situation. Most bond yields have declined significantly below their Nov'11 peaks on hopes of progress towards lower deficits. Yield spreads, though lower, remain high.

10-yr Government bond yields

The chart right shows the monthly average yields for 10-yr government bonds from Jan'08 to Jan'12. Last entry is for the latest available yields (date indicated) to allow comparison with the Jan'12 average.

Since the height of the sovereign debt crisis in Nov'11, bond yields of most of the problem countries have fallen substantially.

Ireland has seen a steep decline in yield, reflecting progress in controlling budget deficit, acknowledged by EU/ECB/IMF inspectors.

Yields also receded markedly in Italy (acknowledging efforts by PM Monti) and in Spain (on hopes new government can implement reforms). Belgium also tightened its fiscal policy.

Downgrade of Portugal's debt to "junk" in Jan'12 forced sales by investors barred from holding securities rated below investment grade. Portuguese yields soared. But so far in Feb'12 yields have fallen back sharply after ECB intervention and after Portuguese government indicated it is accelerating austerity and structural reforms.

Greek yields remain exceptionally high as country is well behind in implementing bailout measures. Greek bonds are to be restructured. Second bailout package not yet approved.

More country details below

10-yr Government bond yield spreads

The chart right shows for 10-yr government bonds the monthly average yield spread vs German Bunds from Jan'08 to Jan'12. Last entry is for the latest available (date indicated) to allow comparison with Jan'12 average.

Spreads soared in Jan'12 in Portugal after its bonds were downgraded to junk. Default of bonds was feared. But spreads narrowed so far in Feb'12.

Spreads remain exceptionally wide in Greece awaiting bond restructuring.

In Ireland the yield spread fell clearly below the Nov'11 peak, reflecting progress in controlling Ireland's budget deficit.

Marked narrowing in yield spreads in Italy, Spain and Belgium.

Yield spreads narrowed by less in France from lower level.

Country details below

 

Country notes:

Greece: verging on hopeless, no substantive structural reforms yet implemented
Budget deficit: 2011: 9% (6% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 163% (rising to 189% in 2012)

Interim coalition government, headed by ex-ECB vice president Lucas Papademos (64), sworn in 11 Nov'11. Weak ability to implement reforms by unwilling/incompetent administration and against agitated social background and opposition from trade unions, politicians and vested interests.

2012 austerity budget approved by parliament 7 Dec. But budget deficit targets continue to slip. Further austerity measures required. Structural reforms not being implemented. Recession deepening, GDP may decline by 6% in 2012.  General elections, pencilled in for Apr'12, hampering implementation of austerity and reforms.

EU/IMF/ECB inspectors reviewing progress since mid-Jan'12. Implementation of reforms reportedly well behind schedule, in part because of politicians electioneering ahead of elections planned for Apr'12. Greek bond yields soar to around 35%.

Second bailout package of EUR130bn finally approved by parliament 13 Feb'12. To cover deepening budget shortfall Greece may require EUR15bn in addition to EUR130bn.


Haircuts on privately held government bonds of 70% currently envisaged under PSI. Further defaults likely. 

Portugal: steep uphill battle, structural reforms underway
Budget deficit: 2011: 5.9% (4.5% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 106% (rising to 112% in 2012)

In recession. GDP estimated to have declined by 3% in 2011. Further 3% decline expected for 2012. Severely restrictive 2012 budget final approval by parliament 29 Nov'11. Deficit to decline to 4.5% from 5.9% in 2011 (5.9% was only achieved through one-off measure: transfer of banks' pension fund to government). General strike 24 Nov'11 protesting austerity measures.

Austerity measures approved by "troika" in Dec'11, but absence of structural measures to improve competitiveness caused concern. Bond yield soared after debt downgraded to junk. But no major bond redemptions due 2012 (Jun'12 EUR13bn due).

 Fears country may need another EUR50bn rescue package in 2013. But government denies this, still intends to return to debt market Sep'13 when EUR78bn bailout ends.

Jolted by spiralling bond yield government speeding up structural reforms. Labour regulations are being eased (easier to hire & fire, lower layoff costs, flexible working hours, fewer public holidays), electricity and gas market liberalised. More reforms in pipeline  (speeding up judicial system, liberalise post and railway sectors, more labour market reforms, reform of licensing and bankruptcy legislation).

Adherence to its bailout programme to be reviewed by EU/IMF/ECB in weeks 7-8.

Ireland: hope
Budget deficit: 2011: 9.9% (6% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 108% (rising to 115% in 2012)

C
lear narrowing bond yield spreads. Ireland claims it bettered its budget deficit target for 2011: 9.9% rather than 10.6% target prescribed by bailout programme. Achieved in spite of weak tax revenue. But task of reigning in deficit mammoth and growth outlook uncertain.

A severely restrictive 5-yr budget plan drawn up with major cuts in health, education and welfare spending. Government targeting 8.6% deficit for 2012.

EU/IMF/ECB inspectors announced 19 Jan'12 that bailout programme on track. Reported good progress in downsizing and strengthening banking system as well as in structural measures to boost economy's growth potential. Ireland hopes to re-enter international bond market by year-end.

Italy: fierce battle against vested interest
Budget deficit: 2011: 4% (2% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 109% (rising to 115% in 2012)

Italy moved into the firing line in Nov'11 after failing to introduce meaningful budget cuts and avoiding structural improvements. After Berlusconi resignation technocratic caretaker government of Mario Monti (68), ex-European Commissioner, to implement reforms. EUR33bn austerity measures to balance budget by 2013 through pension reforms, tax on primary residencies and reducing tax evasion. But Monti also demanding substantial rise in EFSF bailout fund.

Reforms of labour market and welfare system announced. Slew of liberalisation measures passed by decree end-Jan'12. Seen as comprehensive and far reaching, but measures may still be watered down by parliament which has to approve decrees within 60 days. Trade unions fiercely oppose labour reforms. IMF to audit Italy's restrictive measures. High implementation risk.

Spain: resolve of new government to be tested
Budget deficit: 2011: 8.4% (4.4% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 70% (rising to 73% in 2012)

Centre-right People's Party won absolute majority in 20 Nov elections, took office 21 Dec'11.  2011 budget deficit 8.4% of GDP rather than the 6% targeted. Mainly due to overspending by regional governments. Government responded with EUR9bn of spending cuts and EUR6bn of tax hikes.

Government confirmed 4.4% deficit target for 2012. But finance minister (and IMF) expressed doubts because of recession. Also government to raise pensions in line with inflation. Occasional rumours Spain may request bailout from EFSF fund and IMF. Strict budgetary controls over finances of regions to be introduced.

IMF said 24 Jan'12 that it expects a prolonged recession in Spain which will make it impossible for country to respect its 2012 budget deficit target of 4.4% (2011 outcome
≥8%).

Government announced tough proposals to restructure the banking system. Mergers are being encouraged. Banks required to set aside EUR50bn provisions to clean up their balance sheets. Banks are to reduce their real estate portfolios by putting properties on the market. Expected to lead to takeover of weak banks by stronger rivals.

Labour reforms to allow companies to set wages outside industry collective bargaining agreements. Central government and state companies to be reorganised and rationalised. New round of budget cuts in Mar'12 when 2012 budget will be presented. Implementation of reforms difficult, success in curbing deficit uncertain, hampered by weak economy.

Massive trade union protests against Spain's labour reforms on 19 Feb.

Belgium: getting a grip at last
Budget deficit: 2011: 4.2% (2.8% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 97% (declining to 96% in 2012)

Political deadlock over 2012 budget finally cleared 26 Nov'11. Coalition government formed  540 days after election, led by Walloon Socialist Elio De Rupo. Budget deficit estimated at 4.2% for 2011, deeper than planned as growth slipped. Moody's cut credit rating two notches to Aa3.

Early in Jan'12 government, prompted  by European Commission, introduced EUR1bn spending freeze to ensure 2012 deficit target of 2.8% is respected. Permanent spending cuts expected in Feb'12 budget review.

France: near the edge
Budget deficit: 2011: 5.8% (4.6% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 85% (rising to 87% in 2012)

French bond yields rose on fears that faltering growth may raise budget deficit and lose the country's AAA credit rating. Additional EUR65bn of tax increases and spending cuts spread over five years announced in Dec'11.

Early in Jan'12 President Sarkozy said he would now concentrate on promoting growth and employment.  German style labour reforms with flexible labour contracts and lower payroll taxes (offset by 1.6 percentage point VAT hike to 21.2%) to be introduced. A financial transaction tax is to be introduced.

Government cut its 2012 GDP growth forecast to 0.5% (from 1%).

Germany: safe haven status restored
Budget deficit: 2011: 1% (1% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 82% (declining to 81% in 2012)

Bund yield rose after failed bond auction 23 Nov'11 on fears Germany will have to shoulder more of bailout costs. Yield spread between 10-yr Bunds and Treasuries widened to 31 basis points end Nov'11.

Since spread reversed as Bunds revert to safe haven status. 9 Jan'12 even brought short term debt with negative yield. Is unprecedented, "flight to safety".

"Firewall": to approach EUR1tr

In order to prevent default in one country, say Greece, spreading to other problem countries a "firewall" is required. To be able to dispose of sufficient resources for eventual bailouts of Italy and/or Spain larger sums than currently available is deemed necessary.

Running the two bailout funds EFSF (EUR250bn currently available) and ESM (to dispose of EUR500bn) in parallel is being discussed as a way to augment the resources available. With the addition of EUR150bn made available to IMF, the total theoretically  approaches EUR1tr considered necessary by IMF.

IMF seeking USD500bn additional resources to boosts its ability to assist problem countries. USD200bn to come from euro zone countries. China appeared ready to contribute. If successful firewall will exceed EUR1tr.

 

Some background to the euro zone's sovereign debt crisis:

Crisis intensifies as global recession fears mounted


The euro zone's sovereign debt crisis which was ignited by Greece early in 2010 has endured, at times easing, only to flare up more intensely. From Greece it spread to Ireland and then to Portugal and eventually to Spain and Italy. Cyprus, Belgium and France are potential targets. From countries it spread to the banks which are large holders of the sovereign debt of these countries.

The crisis gained in intensity in Sep-Oct'11 as growth in the global economy weakened. Euro zone governments came under intense pressure to diffuse the debt crisis which was seen to greatly contribute to the danger of a global recession because of the uncertainty created, the austerity imposed on the euro zone problem countries and, above all, the fragility of Europe's banking system.

Neither "more Europe" nor "less Europe"

Some saw the problem as "too much Europe", and the solution a smaller euro zone with the weaker countries exiting. Alternatively the stronger countries could form a North Europe monetary union of their own.

Others saw the problem as "not enough Europe", calling for a form of fiscal union to complement the monetary union.

"Just enough Europe"

The path unwaveringly followed by the euro zone authorities, under the leadership of Germany's Chancellor Merkel, was to maintain the status quo, taking only those measures indispensable for the survival of the euro zone, nothing more.

Hence the authorities were constantly seen to do "too little too late", constantly being "behind the curve", "overtaken by events".

"they only listen to the bond markets"

For the monetary union to function properly, budget deficits and maturing debt need to be financeable in the markets. Member countries' economies need to be competitive  to avoid current account deficits which lead to debt crises.
This requires prudent fiscal policies and structural reforms to boost productivity. In spite of the Stability & Growth Pact, peer pressure, exhortations by the ECB and the European Commission and even the strictures of the bailout programmes, various member countries still failed to implement the required fiscal and structural improvements.

Hence the view taken that only rising bond yields ("bond vigilantes") are succeeding in getting governments to take action. Until the euro zone establishes enforceable fiscal rules, the bond vigilantes are considered to be required and financial markets remain unsettled, liable to erupt into turmoil.

No break up


The situation will have to get considerably worse than currently foreseeable for a country to leave the monetary union or for it to break up. The costs involved are high. Even severe austerity imposed on a weak country is preferable to the turmoil of exiting. For Greece only modest benefits beckon from devaluation.

All euro zone countries are showing intense political commitment to monetary union, a stepping stone to eventual political union. A return to a fractured Europe will diminish Europe's stature in the world, lead it to be sidelined.

Yet as the crisis continued to intensify, a break up could no longer be excluded. At least the exit of Greece is no longer a taboo for Europe's leaders.

Special effort required this time

Fiscal integration, centralising major tax and budget decisions, fiscal transfers from richer to poorer countries, issue of euro bonds are all seen as longer term projects, politically difficult or even impossible in the short run.

Though after the failure of the measures decided at the 26-27 Oct'11 summit, and as the crisis dragged on, possibly precipitating a global recession, a special effort was undertaken, culminating in the ECB's extraordinary liquidity measures and the initiatives taken at the 8-9 Dec'11 summit. The new measurers, many believe, may once more fall short of providing a final solution. It may still be "just enough Europe".

If so, yet more new measures will be forthcoming. For the survival of the monetary unions remains the top priority.

For a detailed discussion see: Constitution: will it survive mark 2  

 

 BUDGET DEFICITS
 


 

                              Budget deficits by country 2011
                              as % of GDP
                              (in brackets 2010 deficit)
                                 as estimated by European Commission in November 2011
 

Countries  with deficits of less than 3%

Countries with deficits of
3% to 4.5%
Countries with deficits of
4.5% to 6%
Countries with deficits
 exceeding 6%
 Estonia       + 0.8  (+0.2)
 Luxembourg   0.6  (1.1)
 Finland          1.0  (2.5)
 
Germany       1.3  (4.3)
revised to 1.0

 
  Malta          3.0  (3.6)    
  Austria        3.4  (4.4)
  Belgium      3.6  (4.1) 
  Italy            4.0  (4.6)    
  Netherlands 4.3  (5.1)
  Slovenia     5.7  (5.8)
  Slovakia     5.8  (7.7)
 
France       5.8  (7.1)
 
Portugal     5.8  (9.8) 
  Spain        6.6  (9.3)   revised to >8
 
Cyprus      6.7  (5.3)
  Greece      8.9  (10.6)  
revised to 9 
 
Ireland      10.3 (31.3) 
revised to 9.9
 

Euro area  4.1 (6.2)
for comparison:     UK  9.4  (10.3)              
              US  10.0  (10.6)

 
Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecasts, November 2011.
 

 


 
Background: budget deficits move from quiescence to calamity

The euro zone entered the 2008-09 recession in a sound fiscal position. The budget deficit for the area as a whole amounted in 2007 to a modest 0.7% of GDP. Substantial growth in 2003-07 permitted the government coffers to be replenished after being drained by weak growth earlier in the decade.

Deficits rose rapidly in 2008: to 2.1% of GDP. Initially it was hoped that the 2009 deficits could be contained within the 3% limit set by the Stability and Growth Pact.

But as the severity of the recession became evident more and more fiscal reflationary measures were introduced and deficits soared. The "automatic stabilisers" further deepened the deficits as the recession curtailed tax inflows and boosted social support spending. The recovery of growth in 2010 brought an improvement.

According to Eurostat's Nov'11 report the deficits of the euro area countries added up to a relatively bearable 6.2% of GDP in 2010, down from 6.4% in 2009. But the impact of the recession brought widely divergent country developments, triggering the sovereign debt crisis.

Sovereign debt crisis brings tighter fiscal policies

It was decided late in 2009 by the EU leaders that fiscal policy in 2010 would remain supportive of the recovery and that a start would only be made in 2011 to rein in the budget deficits. But the sovereign debt crisis which erupted early in 2010 in Greece and then spread to other deeply indebted countries forced these countries to introduce restrictive measure much earlier.

The EU was thrown into its deepest crisis yet, necessitating emergency measures, much soul searching and fundamental changes in the EU's architecture. Bailout funds had to be created.
Deficits to shrivel ?

Declines in the deficits were expected over the 2011-12 period on the assumption that growth would strengthened and restrictive fiscal policies would be implemented in virtually all the euro zone countries. Deficits, according to the European Commission's autumn 2011 forecasts, were expected to amount to 4.1% of GDP in 2011, declining further to 3.4% in 2012 and 3.0% in 2013.

Since growth has become negative, endangering deficit targets. Moreover reflationary measures may be required if unemployment rises excessively.

New fiscal rules: "six pack", "fiscal compact"

A new set of fiscal rules came into force 13 Dec'11 under the so-called "six pack" initiative. These aim to make the Stability & Growth Pact more effective by enhancing surveillance of budgets by the European Commission. The debt and deficit limits are the same as for Stability & Growth Pact (3% deficit, 60% deficit limit).

Enforcement is to be enhanced through the imposition of fines (0.2% of GDP for euro zone members) and financial disincentives (suspension of cohesion funds for non members). Imposition to be "semi-automatic" through reverse qualified majority voting (i.e. a weighted majority in the Council has to oppose the imposition of the fine).

The pact also includes a preventative arm which, for countries already respecting the 3% and 60% norms, is to ensure that spending plans do not endanger breaking the norms in future.

The pact moreover includes an "excessive imbalance procedure" with surveillance and enforcement measures to correct imbalances subject to fines on non-compliance. This covers a wide range of macro economic variables such as current accounts, unit labour costs, unemployment, private sector debt. See Six Pack

The European Commission made use of its enhanced powers for the first time shortly after 13 Dec by demanding restrictive measures by Belgium to ensure that the country achieved its 2012 deficit target of 2.8%.

In addition a "fiscal compact" has been drawn up and will enter into force probably in 2013. See below.

 


Fiscal Compact
(Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union)

The treaty was approved at the 30 Jan'12 EU summit by 25 of the EU's 27 members (UK, Czech Republic declined).  It is to be signed 1 Mar'12, then ratified by national parliaments and to enter into force in 2013 once ratified by at least 12 euro zone members. Only countries which have ratified the Treaty will have access to the ESM bailout fund.

The purpose of the treaty is to act as "debt brake", limiting a country's structural budget deficit to 0.5% of GDP. The actual (i.e. cyclical) budget deficit is to be in balance or in surplus.

Various temporary deviations are permitted in "exceptional circumstances" (including severe recessions). Also structural reforms are allowed to slow the path towards the 0.5% for countries exceeding it.

(The various deviations have been criticised by the Bundesbank as making the Treaty too lenient.)

The emphasis on the structural  deficit is to allow a deeper actual deficit in recessions, but requires budget surpluses in boom times.

This to pre-empt a situation where a steep rise in tax revenue in a boom leads to a steep rise in public spending which, when the boom ends, leaves a deficit (as happened in the case of Spain and Ireland during the 2008-09 crisis).


Non compliance of the budget and debt targets are to be reported to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) which may impose a fine of up to 0.1% of the GDP of the offending country (unless waived by a qualified majority).

An adjustment path ("road map") is drawn up by the European Commission to trace the path along which a deficit country is to move to the target of a structural budget deficit of 0.5%.

If a country's debt exceeds the norm of 60% of GDP, the gap is to be closed by 1/20th each year.

A country's debt issuing plans are to be vetted ex-ante by the European Commission and Council.

The Treaty also provides for measures to promote convergence and competitiveness. Structural reforms are to be discussed ex-ante to promote best practice.

Euro zone summit meetings are to be held at least twice a year (fulfilling  a long standing French demand for an "economic government" of the euro zone).

For more details see European-Council

Various observers have qualified the Treaty as of little use. How effective the Treaty will be depends firstly on the determination of the European Commission to apply it. And, secondly, on the willingness of the defaulting country to implement the restrictive measures demanded by the Commission.

Some observers also consider that difficulties may arise in national parliaments during the ratification process.


 

Government debt

 



 

Gross debt by country 2011
as % of GDP
(in brackets 2010 debt)
as calculated by European Commission in November 2011
 

Debt below 60%

Debt in 60% - 79%
 range

Debt in 80% - 99% range

Debt exceeding 100%

Estonia           5.8  (6.7)
Luxembourg   19.5  (19.1)
Slovakia         44.5  (41.0)
Slovenia         45.5  (38.8)
Finland          49.1  (48.3)
 

Netherlands   64.2  (62.9)
Cyprus          64.9  (61.5)

Malta            69.6  (69.0)
Spain            69.6  (61.0)
Austria          72.2  (71.8) 
 

Germany   81.7    (83.2)
France      85.4    (82.3)
Belgium     97.2    (96.2)

Portugal   101.6    (93.3)
Ireland      108.1    (94.9)
Italy         120.5   (118.4)
Greece     162.8   (144.9)
         

 

                         Euro area 88.0  (85.6)
for comparison:            UK  84.0  (79.9)                                   US  94.3 2010

 

 

Government debt by country: from miniscule to perilously high

The reference value of the government debt-to-GDP ratio laid down in the Maastricht Treaty is 60% of GDP. Only five countries currently satisfy this criterion, all countries with small populations, three of them recent members. A further two come quite close while the remaining ten are well over the limit, four with debt-to-GDP ratios exceeding 100%.

Concerns about possible defaults of the most indebted countries have led to wide yield spreads between their government bonds and those of Germany.

The average government debt for the euro zone for 2011 (as calculated by European Commission) is 88% of GDP, thus well over the reference value. This is up from a low of 66.3% achieved in 2007, the lowest result so far after a number of years of  growth provided scope to "deflate" the debt.
The deterioration is due to the deep budget deficits resulting from the 2008-09 recession. The European Commission forecasts a further deterioration to 90.4% in 2012. By 2013 the debt is forecast to amount to 91%.

Greece stands out as the country with the heaviest debt and the second largest 2011 budget deficit (tables above). On the basis of unchanged policies Greece's debt will spiral out of control. Even under a severely restrictive fiscal regime only a slower rise in the debt can be achieved in the medium term.

European Commission estimates that Greece's debt will rise to 198.5% in 2013. A debt restructuring is inevitable and is being attempted.

The debt of Italy is also exceptionally high at 120% of GDP. The debts of Ireland and Portugal also now exceed 100%.

 

When does a debt burden become unsustainable?
The example of Greece

It is difficult to pinpoint in advance when a country's debt burden becomes unsustainable. But its clear that it cannot rise forever. The debt burden is measured by the debt stock/nominal GDP ratio. The stock of debt rises as the government runs budget deficits while nominal GDP rises as the economy grows and the price level rises. If the debt rises faster than GDP, danger may lie ahead.

With a rising debt burden the financial markets may suspect at some point that the debt may become too large for the government to be able to meet its repayment obligations. As the risk of default rises the market will demand higher interest rates to compensate for the higher risk.

Higher interest payments raise the debt service payments, thereby worsening the budget deficit, further accentuating the risk and increasing the debt service payments, creating a vicious spiral which inevitable leads to default if no remedial action is taken. Even then fiscal restrictions may not reduce the debt burden if the measures reduce growth of the economy or lead to a recession.

Greece's debt ratio was stable for most of the noughties at around 100, not causing any concern. The yield spread between Greek and German 10-year bonds was in the range of 20 to 30 basis points.
 

The debt ratio jumped to 129 in 2009 and further to 145 in 2010. The steep rise in 2009 was due to the (global) recession deepening the budget deficit and the uncovering of hidden debt. Greece faced rapidly rising interest rates on its borrowing which further deepened the budget deficit.

Greece's partners in the euro zone and the IMF had to step in and provide it with the funds to cover its borrowing requirement for the 2010-12 years, initially at an interest rate of 5%, well below what Greece would have had to pay in the markets. The government introduced severe austerity measures, but failed to meet its targets and the debt burden is rising further, to 198 in 2013 (according to the European Commission). This is so high that the financial markets consider a debt restructuring inevitable.

The EUR110bn loan granted to Greece in 2010 was to cover Greece's financial needs to mid-2012. In subsequent years its financial needs (repaying maturing loans, financing its running budget deficit) was estimated to amount to EUR60-70bn per year. With borrowing in the markets excluded Greece was forced to seek another bailout, this time amounting to EUR130bn.

Problems abound. Granting Greece more funds is unpopular in the donor countries and may lead to voter revolt and moral hazard. The severe austerity regime imposed on Greece lead to demonstrations in the streets and political turmoil. Debt rescheduling may have a negative impact on the Europe's financial system as banks and other financial institutions (and the ECB) are major holders of Greek debt. A satisfactory solution remains to be found.

 

Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt            

A necessary condition to avoid a country's budget deficit "snowballing", i.e. deepening and eventually becoming un-financeable in the markets, is that the surplus on the primary budget (i.e. the budget minus interest payments on the government debt), (S), should be at least as high as the sum of the difference between the nominal interest rate (r) and the nominal growth rate of the economy (g) times the ratio of government debt/GDP (D):

S ≥ (r - g) D

see De Grauwe. See also Gross and Alcidi, "Adjustment Difficulties and Debt Overhangs in the Eurozone Periphery", May 2011.

The formula has been applied to selected countries in the tables below. The calculations are very sensitive to the rate of interest a country has to pay on its government debt. The higher the interest rate the bigger a primary surplus required to prevent snowballing (and vice versa).

The calculations are equally sensitive to growth. The weaker nominal growth, the bigger the surplus required  (and vice versa).

The interest rate the bailed out countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal) had to pay prior to the bailout rose so high that the snowball effect made the debt unbearable. The subsidised rate they currently pay removes this obstacle. But the austerity imposed has reduced growth, worsening the second element in the equation. The bailed out countries still have a mountain to climb.

The other vulnerable countries have become more vulnerable in H2'11 as interest rates have risen and growth slowed (France, Italy, Belgium and Spain). In contrast the UK and the US have become less vulnerable as their bond yields dropped.

 

Country notes based on Nov'11 data
updated 13 Dec'11

Germany
is the only country (of those listed in the table) with a primary budget balance expected for 2012 (a surplus of 1.3% of GDP), larger than the primary budget balance required to stabilise the debt (a deficit of 0.2% of GDP). The latter is particularly low as the economy is expected to grow in nominal terms  faster than the interest rate it may have to pay on its government debt. There is considerable scope for reflation.

France is seeing slower nominal GDP growth in 2012, calling for a primary budget surplus of 1.2%. But a primary deficit for 2012 of 2.5% is expected. A tightening of 3.7% of GDP is thus required to stabilise the debt.

Italy is handicapped by modest nominal GDP growth, high interest rates and a large debt. This calls for a primary budget surplus of 5.9% of GDP to stabilise the debt in 2012. But as a surplus of 3.1% of GDP is expected, only an additional tightening of 2.8% of GDP is required, less than in the case of France.

Belgium: Expected nominal growth of the economy is below the interest rate, calling for primary budget surplus of 1.9% of GDP. The expected primary deficit is 1.3%, thus require an adjustment of 3.2%.

Spain suffers from modest nominal growth and high interest rate but a low debt burden. A primary budget surplus of 3.3% of GDP is required compared to an expected 2012 deficit of 3.5% of GDP, thus a massive 6.7% correction is required, well above what is required in Italy.

Greece: the interest rate is around 30%, the economy in deep recession and the debt is newly two times GDP. This calls for a primary budget surplus of 66% of GDP. In fact Greece does not pay the market rate for its funds, but the subsidised rate of the bailout fund of 3%. Also its debt/GDP ratio is to be reduced to 120% by imposing a debt restructuring. The austerity measures already imposed should bring a primary surplus of 1% in 2012.. This reduces the required correction to 5.7%. Still a mammoth task for an economy already in a deep recession. A drastic further write down of its debt may be unavoidable. Hope is this can be avoided until progress elsewhere reduces risk of contagion.

Portugal: interest rates are around 12%, the economy is shrinking and the debt exceeds GDP. This calls for a primary budget surplus of 15.6% of GDP. Portugal also does not pay the market rate and the austerity measures are expected to bring a 0.8% primary surplus in 2012. This reduces the additional required correction to 4.6%. Still a formidable task.

Ireland: interest rates are high, as is the debt, but the economy is growing. A primary budget surplus of 8% of GDP is required as well as the elimination of the 2012 expected primary budget deficit of 4.3%, a turnaround of 12.2% of GDP. Ireland also does not pay the market rate, but the subsidised rate of 3%. This reduces the required correction to 5.7%.

UK: nominal growth exceeds the interest rate and a primary budget deficit of 1.3% of GDP would stabilise the debt. The expected 2012 primary budget deficit amounts to 4.6% of GDP, the correction required thus amounts to 3.3%. The steep fall in gilts, which benefitted from safe haven flows, has benefitted the UK.

US
: growth is well ahead of the interest rate on 10-yr Treasuries (which also benefitted from safe haven flows), but the debt exceeds GDP and the primary budget is expected to show a deficit of 5.4% of GDP. This calls for a correction of 4% of GDP.


Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt

as % of GDP
calculation based on Nov'11 data

Selected country

S
Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt in 2012

Expected primary budget balance in 2012 surplus (+), deficit (-) *

Required change to  primary budget balance 2012 **
 
Germany -0.2  1.3   -1.5
France 1.2   -2.5     3.7
Italy 6.1    3.1      3.0
Belgium 1.8    -1.3      3.1
Spain 3.2   -3.5      6.7
       
Greece 66.2   1.0    65.2
   with subsidised rate 6.7 1.0      5.7
Portugal 15.3 0.8 14.5
   with subsidised rate 5.4 0.8    4.6
Ireland 7.9 -4.3 12.2
   subsidised rate 1.4 -4.3       5.7
for comparison:      
UK -1.3 -4.6     3.3
US -1.4 -5.4    4.0
       
For detailed calculations see table below.
*
Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast, Autumn 2011
**
This results from the previous two columns: the required primary budget balance and the actual (estimated) balance for 2012. Only in Germany does the actual balance exceed the required balance. In the other countries listed the two have to be added.

 


 

The table right is based on the data for Nov'11. The results are highly sensitive to the bond yield and the nominal GDP growth rate.

For a calculation based on May'11 data see below.


Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt

as % of GDP
calculation based on Nov'11 data

Selected country

r
Nominal interest rate: 10-yr govt bond yield (%), average for Nov'11

g
Nominal GDP growth expected for 2012*
%
D
Government debt/GDP ratio*
2012
 
S
Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt:
% of GDP

Expected primary budget balance 2012* surplus (+), deficit (-) 
% of GDP

Required change to  primary budget balance 2012 **
% of GDP
Germany 1.87   2.2   0.812   -0.2   1.3    -1.5  
France 3.41   2.1    0.892   1.2    -2.5     3.7  
Italy  7.06   2.0   1.205   6.1     3.1    3.0  
Belgium  4.84   3.0    0.992   1.8     -1.3     3.1  
Spain 6.20   1.8   0.738   3.2   -3.5     6.7  
             
Greece  30.8   -2.6     1.983    66.2    1.0    65.2
   subsidised rate 3 -2.6 1.200 6.72 1.0 5.7
Portugal 11.89 -1.9   1.11   15.3 0.8 14.5
   subsidised rate 3 -1.9 1.11 5.4 0.8 4.6
Ireland 8.51 1.8 1.175 7.9 -4.3 12.2
   subsidised rate 3 1.8 1.175 1.4 -4.3 5.7
for comparison:            
UK 2.29 3.7 0.888 -1.3 -4.6 3.3
US 2.0 3.3 1.056 -1.4 -5.4 4.0
             
* Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast, Autumn 2011
**
This results from the previous two columns: the required primary budget balance and the actual (estimated) balance for 2012. Only in Germany does the actual balance exceed the required balance. In the other countries listed the two have to be added.

 

BACKGROUND
 

From "No Bailout" to Fiscal Compact

The 2008-09 recession was so deep that the 3% deficit limit of the Stability and Growth Pact could be exceeded. The Pact allowed this if a country is “seriously threatened with severe difficulties caused by circumstances beyond its control”. But the European Commission and the ECB insisted that countries are expected to return to the strictures of the Pact as soon as possible.

The individual countries found themselves in widely differing positions (see table above). Already in 2009 it was feared that some countries could find it difficult to refinance their debt, even be forced to leave the euro zone. The yield gap between German government bonds and those of some other euro zone countries at such times widened alarmingly.

Though the euro zone has a "no bail out clause" the European Commission announced early in 2009 that a way had been found for the stronger euro zone countries to assist the weaker ones if needed (without providing any details). In fact the "no bail-out clause" allows bail-outs of a member country following "natural disasters or other exceptional occurrences beyond its control." This covers virtually anything.

In 2009 Ireland was the worst affected. After the collapse of its property boom a startlingly steep decline in the inflow of tax revenues forced the Irish government to introduce severe austerity measures, for fear that the deficit could no longer be financed. The measures sufficed to calm the markets and Ireland was able to borrow at reasonably low rates.

Early in 2010 Greece moved into the firing line after its newly elected government revealed that the country's budget deficit was twice as deep as stated by the previous government. Greece was forced to follow the Irish example and introduced drastic austerity measures. In return Greece was granted substantial financial assistance by member countries.

As solvency fears spread to other deeply indebted south European countries, Spain, Italy and Portugal announced new austerity measures. In order to counter the intensifying pressures on the euro zone's financial system the EU drew up a EUR750bn package of measures during the week-end of 8-9 May'10 after intensive and divisive emergency negotiations (details below).

In spite of the huge amount involved the financial markets, after the initial euphoria passed, reacted with scepticism as many of the details of how the package would be applied were not specified. The package was a compromise between open-ended support favoured by France and much more restrictive support favoured by Germany. The divisions fuelled market scepticism.

To some this was the beginning of the creation of the "fiscal roof" the euro zone lacked. To others it was a temporary, three year, arrangement to tide over current difficulties. Either way the commitment of such a large sum of tax payers' money to financially assist weaker members was a demonstration of the cohesion of the euro zone. Germany in particular accepted that weaker euro zone members can access funds guaranteed by stronger members, a fiscal transfer mechanism of sorts.

Financial markets reacted with scepticism, fearing that the deeply indebted euro zone countries may fail to impose the required fiscal restrictions or that they may stifle growth. But in the course on Jun-Jul'10 the markets gradually accepted that these measures taken by the ECB and the EU  defused the crisis. Meanwhile the European Commission set to work on proposals to address the euro zones debt issues.

The serenity was shattered by Ireland in the autumn of 2010 as the costs of bailing out its failing banks rose to astronomical level. A financial rescue package was negotiated with the EU and the IMF in Nov'10. Portugal in Apr'11 became the third country calling for a bailout. In Mar'11 the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) was created, followed in Jan'12 by the Fiscal Compact (see below).

This may still not be the end.

 

European Union's financial support packages of May'10

European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF): Euro zone governments in May'10 created a "special purpose vehicle" (SPV) which could raise up to EUR440bn in the markets in the form of loans guaranteed by all euro zone countries.

  • The money is lent on in the form of bilateral 3-year loans from euro zone countries to euro zone countries in financial difficulties and subject to these countries implementing fiscal restrictions to contain their budget deficits under close supervision of the IMF and EU ("IMF conditionality").

  • EFSF funds may also be used to recapitalise banks.

  • When a country is drawing on the fund it will step out of its commitment with the guarantees of the remaining countries scaled up commensurately.

  •  The fund is located in Luxembourg and headed by an official from the European Commission (Klaus Regling, a German national).

  • Initially it was hoped that if no country requests assistance (i.e. they can raise all they need in the markets), the fund may never be used. The mere existence of the fund, it was argued, may mean that it won't be needed. In fact Ireland became the first country to draw on it.

  • EFSF debt got a AAA credit rating. Initially the need for a cash buffer to maintain AAA rating reduced effective lending capacity to EUR230bn. But 20 Jun'11 effective lending capacity was raised to EUR440bn after countries raised their guarantees.

  • Japan undertook 12 Jan'11 to buy more than 20% of the bonds to be sold later in month to fund bailout for Ireland.

European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM): A EUR60bn rapid reaction stabilisation fund was also created in May'10, controlled by the European Commission and modelled on, and in addition to, the "balance of payments facility" hitherto used to aid EU members not part of the euro zone.

  • The money is borrowed by the Commission in the financial markets and EU member countries only become liable if the disbursed money is not eventually paid back by the recipients.

  • The funds can be used for all EU members (not only those EU members not part of the euro zone) and was intended as a first line of defence in a financial crisis. (The second line of defence being the EFSF)

  • EUR5bn of 2.5% five-year notes were issued 6 Jan'11, the first instalment of financial aid for Ireland. The issue yield was 2.59% and elicited strong demand. The funds were lent to Ireland at 5.51%.

IMF contribution: The IMF contributes one euro to the aid package for every two euros contributed by the EU. On the assumption that the EU package amounts to EUR500bn (EUR440bn + EUR60bn), the IMF's contribution amounts to EUR250bn.

European Stability Mechanism (ESM): In Dec'10 the EU leaders reached agreement on a new permanent bailout vehicle, the ESM, to replace the EFSF in 2013. The ESM is subject to unanimity in decision making and its loans have preferred creditor status (but junior to IMF loans). The ESM is in the form of an amendment to the EU treaties and requires ratification by all 27 member states.

 

Mar'11 summits: euro zone leaders reach agreement  in principle about measures to cope with sovereign debt crises

Result of summits was ahead of initial market expectations, but left some essential details to be agreed. The measures required formal approval by all euro zone members.

Short term measures

  • Lower borrowing costs for countries unable to finance their budget deficits in the markets (excluding initially for Ireland)

  • Increased financial backing for the current bail-out fund (European Financial Stability Facility, EFSF) agreed in principle, allowing it to use the full EUR440bn sum with AAA rating (rather than EUR250bn up to now) But no agreement yet on how this is to be achieved. For now the EFSF still only disposes of EUR250bn.

  • EFSF funds can be used to buy sovereign bonds in primary markets (i.e. when issued), but not in secondary market (as demanded by Greece) or from ECB (as demanded by the ECB). This should allow indebted countries to borrow at lower rates, but subject to the country entering into an austerity programme.

  • Greece was offered a one percentage point reduction in its borrowing costs from the bail-out fund (it had asked for two percentage points) and an extension of its repayment schedule to 7½ years (from 4½ years) in exchange for increased privatisations.

  • After acrimonious exchanges no relief was initially granted to Ireland as it refused to offer to raise its (ultra low) corporate tax rate.

Long term measures

  •  Agreement in principle about bailout fund (European Stability Mechanism) which in June 2013 is to take over from the current bailout fund (EFSF). The ESM is to draw on EUR80bn paid-in capital and EUR620 callable capital, enabling it to lend EUR500bn. This to allow the fund to have a AAA credit rating. The fund can be seen as creating a "transfer union", where the richer countries provide financial support for the weaker ones.

  • The EMS to charge 200 basis points more  than its funding costs for loans up to three years and 300 basis points for longer loans. ESM was to enjoy preferred creditor status and decide case-by-case whether private bond holders were to share cost of bailouts. But 20 Jun'11 it was decided that ESM loans are not to have preferred status over private creditors. Funds are provided subject to the recipient country taking corrective action (to counter moral hazard).

  • The  "euro-plus pact", previously "competitiveness pact", received widespread acceptance after original Franco-German proposal was watered down. It aims to prevent future debt crises by harmonising budgetary, tax and social policies. The measures to be taken are voluntary (there are no sanctions) and are to be supervised by the European Commission. It is a general appeal for wage restraint, raising the retirement age, commitment to rigorous budget and labour market reforms as well as harmonisation of the corporate tax rate. Six non-euro zone countries have joined the pact. More are free to join later.

  • The member countries have also committed themselves to translate the provisions of the Stability & Growth Pact into national legislation and put in place national legislation for banking resolution. The debt stock is to be reduced by 1/20th annually where the existing debt stock exceeds 60% of GDP.

  • The euro zone heads of government are to meet once a year to verify progress. But all other EU countries are invited to join. This can conceivably be seen as a form of "economic government".

 



21 Jul'11 measures
: second bail out for Greece

A second bailout for Greece was agreed with a major contribution from the private sector and a "Marshall Aid" plan to rehabilitate the economy. The bailout terms for all the bailed out countries were softened (lower interest rates, longer repayment periods).

Greece is to be provided with EUR159 of new aid. This sum is to include a EUR50bn contribution from Greek bond holders which resulted in the rating agency Fitch declaring Greece in restrictive default. ECB said that it will nevertheless continue to accept Greek bonds as collateral  after euro zone governments provided guarantees, backing Greek bonds up to a value of EUR35bn.



The operations of the bailout funds (EFSF, ESM) are being extended, permitting buying bonds in secondary markets, recapitalise banks and offer IMF style precautionary credit lines.

The Stability & Growth Pact and macro economic surveillance is to be strengthened. National fiscal frameworks are to be introduced by end 2012.

The measures were poorly received by the financial markets as not providing a solution to the sovereign debt crisis. The the bond yields of the most indebted countries continued to rise. Specifically Italian and Spanish bonds came under intense selling pressure. The agreement remains to be ratified by parliaments.

 


26-27 Oct'11 summit: definite solution sought .....

The 26-27 Oct summit of euro zone leaders ended with agreement on various measures to diffuse the debt crisis by providing liquidity to counties finding it difficult to borrow in the markets:
  •  the EUR440 EFSF rescue fund is to be leveraged by a combination of an insurance scheme and Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), hoping to attract funds from abroad (e.g. from China). If successful it is hoped that the EFSF will dispose of EUR1trillion, rather than just EUR440bn.
  • European banks are to be recapitalised with EUR106bn, to be achieved by mid-2012 through retained earnings, share issues, national government contributions and, as a last resort, through the EFSF bailout fund.
  • The ECB signalled that it may continue with its bond buying programme.
  • Greece was granted a new EUR130bn aid package. A 50% "voluntary" write down of Greek bonds privately held has been agreed with the banks. The aim is to stabilise Greek debt at 120% of GDP by 2020 from 170% currently. Greece is to increase privatisations and parts of its economic policy will be dictated by the EU.
  • Italy undertook to step up measures to reduce its debt, accepted IMF monitors.

Much of the detail remained to be decided. The initial reaction of markets was favourable.

Reportedly a euro zone "war cabinet" of sorts had been formed which assumed leadership, meeting frequently and informally. It consisted of Chancellor Merkel, President Sarkozy, ECB's Draghi, IMF's Lagarde and EU's Van Rompuy, Barosso and Juncker.
 

..... but not attained

The summit sought a longer lasting solution to the debt crisis. The measures announced briefly boosted the EUR, stock markets and the bonds of the indebted countries. But markets soon had second thoughts and the crisis intensified.

It has become clear that the revamped EFSF bailout fund will not dispose of enough resources, even if leveraged, to cover the potential needs of Italy and Spain. The process of achieving leverage soon revealed itself to be complicated and only modest success beckoned. Cash rich developing countries, such as China, indicated little interest. Finance ministers were hoping to present the leveraged EFSF in Dec'11.

Markets further consider that the EUR106bn recapitalisation of banks fell short of what was required. Analysts generally considered a much larger recapitalisation essential. Also the 50% write down on Greek bonds was seen insufficient to restore the country to solvency.

It was widely believed that only the ECB could provide sufficient resources to cope with the financial needs of the indebted euro zone countries. So far Germany and the ECB itself have refused, fearing governments would relax corrective measures once bond yields back at affordable levels.

Early in week 44 the unexpected announcement that Greek PM Papandreou was to call a referendum on Greece's aid package caused panic in the markets. A "no" could have led to a disorderly default of Greek debt. The exit of Greece from the monetary union was for the first time officially seen as possible. The referendum was then cancelled, followed by a government of national unity under ex-ECB vice president PM Papademos.

Focus then shifted to Italy and Spain as these countries' bond yields rose to unsustainable levels. In Italy a technocrat government under ex-European commissioner PM Monty took over from Berlusconi. In Spain the centre-right Popular Party won the Nov'11 elections and formally took over from the defeated Socialists on 13 Dec.

 


8-9 Dec'11 summit: definite solution sought .....

At the EU summit of 8-9 Dec'11 another attempt was made to "solve" the debt crisis. This after the failure of the measures of the 26-27 Oct'11 summit, which was followed by a wave of selling of euro zone government bonds focused on Italy, Spain and France, even at one stage drawing Bunds into the melee.

Measures decided were at lower range of what could have been expected. Emphasis remained on imposing austerity on problem countries with tighter deficit rules. But resources available for bailouts were substantially increased. After an initial bounce, markets gave summit package the thumbs down.

Measures:
  •  A new fiscal compact is to limit debt and deficits. Each country to add to its constitution the commitment to a balanced budgets. Legislation to be verified by the European Court of Justice.
  • Countries required to submit their budgets to Brussels for vetting. If country's deficit exceeds 3% of GDP, (semi) automatic sanctions to be triggered (unless 85% of euro zone countries vote against sanctions).
  • Structural budget deficits to be capped at 0.5% of GDP.
  • Compact to be signed by Mar'12. This, some consider, may allow ECB to intervene more aggressively in the bond markets.
  • EU central banks to provide EUR200bn to the IMF; funds to be used to aid any countries in financial difficulties (currently these are the most indebted euro zone countries). The contributions of the EU are expected to attract contributions from G20 countries (e.g. China), raising the total to well over EUR200bn.
  • The establishment of the permanent EUR500bn EMS bailout fund to be advanced to Jul'12 (from Jun'13). For first year EMS will run concurrently with EFSF bailout fund.
  • In the case of a country being bailed out, losses would not be imposed on private sector bond holders (i.e. no "private sector involvement", PSI). Instead IMF practice of case-by-case to be followed. Germany previously insisted on losses imposed on private bond holders.
..... results seen to fall short with legal hurdles and implementation risk

Difficulties ahead, implementation not assured:
  • An EU Treaty change was ruled out by UK veto, raising legal issues. Introduces new split in EU.
  • The fiscal compact is to be embedded in euro zone member countries' national legal system at constitutional level. National debates now taking place. Unlikely to be smooth.
  • High level of uncertainty about whether the fiscal compact will be properly embedded in national legislation by all countries within the set time frame.
  • Other EU members (not part of euro zone) may join the fiscal compact (six agreed, three considering).
  • Most of the detailed provisions of fiscal compact remain to be worked out. Still to be decided how legal limits on budgets will be policed and what penalties will be imposed.
  • Can new fiscal rules be enforced by European Commission which has no role in agreements outside the EU Treaty?  Commission seeking way out.
  • Proposals to allow the current EFSF bailout fund to continue alongside the EMS fund accepted only for the period Jul'12 to Jun'13.
  • Proposal to give a banking license to the EMS funds to allow it to borrow from the ECB and multiply its intervention power also not accepted. Though may be reviewed later.
  • ECB continues to say that it will not act as a backstop to the bond market. Insists solution to crisis is in the hands of governments, i.e. taking restrictive measures to bring budget deficits in line with what can be readily financed in the markets.
  • Doubts multiply about EUR200bn European central bank loans to IMF and matching contributions from  other countries. UK and US refused, others (China, Brazil) reticent. By 19 Dec European central banks had only agreed to advance EUR150bn to IMF. More may still come in
  • S&P rating agency 5 Dec placed euro zone's six AAA rated countries (including Germany, France) on review for possible downgrade.
  • S&P downgraded EFSF bailout fund to AA+ (from AAA). This may raise the fund's borrowing costs and reduce its ability to leverage.
     

 


Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt in 2012

 

simplified table
Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt in 2012

as % of GDP, calculation based on Nov'11 data

Selected country

S
Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt

Expected primary budget balance in 2012 surplus (+), deficit (-) 

Required change to  primary budget balance 2012
 
Spain 3.2 -3.5 6.7
Greece  subsidised rate 6.7 1.0 5.7
Ireland   subsidised rate 1.4 -4.3 5.7
Portugal  subsidised rate 5.4 0.8 4.6


 

simplified table
Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt in 2012

as % of GDP, calculation based on Nov'11 data

Selected country

S
Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt

Expected primary budget balance in 2012 surplus (+), deficit (-) 

Required change to  primary budget balance 2012
 
France 1.2   -2.5     3.7 
Belgium 1.8 -1.3 3.1
Italy 6.1    3.1      3.0  
                     for comparison:      
UK -1.3 -4.6   3.3  
US -1.4 -5.4   4.0  


 


Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt

as % of GDP
calculation based on May'11 data

Selected country

r
Nominal interest rate: 10-yr govt bond yield (%), average for May 2011

g
Nominal GDP growth expected for 2011
%
D
Government debt/GDP ratio*
S
Required primary budget balance:
% of GDP

Expected primary budget balance 2011* surplus (+), deficit (-) 
% of GDP

Required change to  primary budget balance **
% of GDP
Germany 3.06 4.5 0.824 -1.2 0.4 -1.6
France 3.49 4.0 0.847 -0.4 -3.1 2.7
Italy 4.76 2.7 1.203 2.5 0.8 1.7
Belgium 4.21 4.5 0.97 -0.3 -0.4 0.1
Spain 5.32 2.0 0.681 2.3 -4.1 6.4
             
Greece 15.94 -3.5 1.577 30.7 -2.8 33.5
   subsidised rate 5 " " 13.4 " 16.2
Portugal 9.63 -1.5 1.017 11.3 -1.7 13.0
   subsidised rate 5 " " 6.6 " 8.3
Ireland 10.64 1.5 1.120 10.2 -6.8 17.0
   subsidised rate 5.8 " " 4.8 " 11.6
for comparison:            
UK 3.49 3.7 0.842 -0.2 -5.5 5.3
US 3.15 4.5 1.200 -1.6 -7.1 5.5
             
* Source: European Commission, European Economic Forecast, Spring 2011
**
This results from the previous two columns: the required primary budget balance and the actual (estimated) balance for 2011. Only in Germany does the actual balance exceed the required balance. In the other countries listed the two have to be added.

 


All parts of this site © Copyright 2011 Euroeconomics - site by webbex