
GOVERNMENT DEBT and FISCAL POLICY
This sections reviews the sovereign debt crisis and the various attempts to come to grips with it.
The fiscal policy of the euro zone, budgets and debts of the individual countries are surveyed.
IN THIS SECTION: Sovereign debt crisis
Yield spreads & news
Problem countries
Some background
Budget deficits current and forecast
Fiscal Compact
Government debt: current and forecast
Unsustainable debt burden
Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt
Sovereign debt crisis: bailout funds
Background
From "no bailouts" to Fiscal Compact
EU's financial support package of May'10
European Financial Stability Facility/Stabilisation Mechanism
26-27 Oct'11 summit
8-9 Dec'11 summit
S U M M A R Y
Last updated 22 Feb'12 a.m.
Debt crisis eased. Yield spreads between German bonds and the bonds of most of the problem countries narrowed markedly in Jan-Feb'12. But spreads remain wide. The problem countries are finding it difficult to implement austerity measures in recessionary climate and against opposition from vested interests.
Sovereign debt crisis news: bond yield spreads mostly narrow after Greek deal |
|
|
|
|
10-yr Government bond yields
|
|
|
10-yr Government bond yields
The chart right shows the monthly average yields for 10-yr government bonds from Jan'08 to Jan'12. Last entry is for the latest available yields (date indicated) to allow comparison with the Jan'12 average. Since the height of the sovereign debt crisis in Nov'11, bond yields of most of the problem countries have fallen substantially. Ireland has seen a steep decline in yield, reflecting progress in controlling budget deficit, acknowledged by EU/ECB/IMF inspectors. Yields also receded markedly in Italy (acknowledging efforts by PM Monti) and in Spain (on hopes new government can implement reforms). Belgium also tightened its fiscal policy. Downgrade of Portugal's debt to "junk" in Jan'12 forced sales by investors barred from holding securities rated below investment grade. Portuguese yields soared. But so far in Feb'12 yields have fallen back sharply after ECB intervention and after Portuguese government indicated it is accelerating austerity and structural reforms. Greek yields remain exceptionally high as country is well behind in implementing bailout measures. Greek bonds are to be restructured. Second bailout package not yet approved. More country details below |
|
|
10-yr Government bond yield
spreads
The chart right shows for 10-yr government bonds the monthly average yield spread vs German Bunds from Jan'08 to Jan'12. Last entry is for the latest available (date indicated) to allow comparison with Jan'12 average. Spreads soared in Jan'12 in Portugal after its bonds were downgraded to junk. Default of bonds was feared. But spreads narrowed so far in Feb'12. Spreads remain exceptionally wide in Greece awaiting bond restructuring. In Ireland the yield spread fell clearly below the Nov'11 peak, reflecting progress in controlling Ireland's budget deficit. Marked narrowing in yield spreads in Italy, Spain and Belgium. Yield spreads narrowed by less in France from lower level. Country details below |
|
|
Country notes: Greece: verging on hopeless, no substantive structural reforms yet implemented Budget deficit: 2011: 9% (6% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 163% (rising to 189% in 2012) Interim coalition government, headed by ex-ECB vice president Lucas Papademos (64), sworn in 11 Nov'11. Weak ability to implement reforms by unwilling/incompetent administration and against agitated social background and opposition from trade unions, politicians and vested interests. 2012 austerity budget approved by parliament 7 Dec. But budget deficit targets continue to slip. Further austerity measures required. Structural reforms not being implemented. Recession deepening, GDP may decline by 6% in 2012. General elections, pencilled in for Apr'12, hampering implementation of austerity and reforms. EU/IMF/ECB inspectors reviewing progress since mid-Jan'12. Implementation of reforms reportedly well behind schedule, in part because of politicians electioneering ahead of elections planned for Apr'12. Greek bond yields soar to around 35%. Second bailout package of EUR130bn finally approved by parliament 13 Feb'12. To cover deepening budget shortfall Greece may require EUR15bn in addition to EUR130bn. Haircuts on privately held government bonds of 70% currently envisaged under PSI. Further defaults likely. Portugal: steep uphill battle, structural reforms underway Budget deficit: 2011: 5.9% (4.5% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 106% (rising to 112% in 2012) In recession. GDP estimated to have declined by 3% in 2011. Further 3% decline expected for 2012. Severely restrictive 2012 budget final approval by parliament 29 Nov'11. Deficit to decline to 4.5% from 5.9% in 2011 (5.9% was only achieved through one-off measure: transfer of banks' pension fund to government). General strike 24 Nov'11 protesting austerity measures. Austerity measures approved by "troika" in Dec'11, but absence of structural measures to improve competitiveness caused concern. Bond yield soared after debt downgraded to junk. But no major bond redemptions due 2012 (Jun'12 EUR13bn due). Fears country may need another EUR50bn rescue package in 2013. But government denies this, still intends to return to debt market Sep'13 when EUR78bn bailout ends. Jolted by spiralling bond yield government speeding up structural reforms. Labour regulations are being eased (easier to hire & fire, lower layoff costs, flexible working hours, fewer public holidays), electricity and gas market liberalised. More reforms in pipeline (speeding up judicial system, liberalise post and railway sectors, more labour market reforms, reform of licensing and bankruptcy legislation). Adherence to its bailout programme to be reviewed by EU/IMF/ECB in weeks 7-8. Ireland: hope Budget deficit: 2011: 9.9% (6% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 108% (rising to 115% in 2012) Clear narrowing bond yield spreads. Ireland claims it bettered its budget deficit target for 2011: 9.9% rather than 10.6% target prescribed by bailout programme. Achieved in spite of weak tax revenue. But task of reigning in deficit mammoth and growth outlook uncertain. A severely restrictive 5-yr budget plan drawn up with major cuts in health, education and welfare spending. Government targeting 8.6% deficit for 2012. EU/IMF/ECB inspectors announced 19 Jan'12 that bailout programme on track. Reported good progress in downsizing and strengthening banking system as well as in structural measures to boost economy's growth potential. Ireland hopes to re-enter international bond market by year-end. Italy: fierce battle against vested interest Budget deficit: 2011: 4% (2% targeted for 2012); Debt 2011: 109% (rising to 115% in 2012) Italy moved into the firing line in Nov'11 after failing to introduce meaningful budget cuts and avoiding structural improvements. After Berlusconi resignation technocratic caretaker government of Mario Monti (68), ex-European Commissioner, to implement reforms. EUR33bn austerity measures to balance budget by 2013 through pension reforms, tax on primary residencies and reducing tax evasion. But Monti also demanding substantial rise in EFSF bailout fund. Reforms of labour market and welfare system announced. Slew of liberalisation measures passed by decree end-Jan'12. Seen as comprehensive and far reaching, but measures may still be watered down by parliament which has to approve decrees within 60 days. Trade unions fiercely oppose labour reforms. IMF to audit Italy's restrictive measures. High implementation risk. |
Spain: resolve of new government to be tested |
|
Some background to the euro zone's sovereign debt crisis:
Crisis intensifies as global recession fears mounted The euro zone's sovereign debt crisis which was ignited by Greece early in 2010 has endured, at times easing, only to flare up more intensely. From Greece it spread to Ireland and then to Portugal and eventually to Spain and Italy. Cyprus, Belgium and France are potential targets. From countries it spread to the banks which are large holders of the sovereign debt of these countries. The crisis gained in intensity in Sep-Oct'11 as growth in the global economy weakened. Euro zone governments came under intense pressure to diffuse the debt crisis which was seen to greatly contribute to the danger of a global recession because of the uncertainty created, the austerity imposed on the euro zone problem countries and, above all, the fragility of Europe's banking system. Neither "more Europe" nor "less Europe" Some saw the problem as "too much Europe", and the solution a smaller euro zone with the weaker countries exiting. Alternatively the stronger countries could form a North Europe monetary union of their own. Others saw the problem as "not enough Europe", calling for a form of fiscal union to complement the monetary union. "Just enough Europe" The path unwaveringly followed by the euro zone authorities, under the leadership of Germany's Chancellor Merkel, was to maintain the status quo, taking only those measures indispensable for the survival of the euro zone, nothing more. Hence the authorities were constantly seen to do "too little too late", constantly being "behind the curve", "overtaken by events". "they only listen to the bond markets" For the monetary union to function properly, budget deficits and maturing debt need to be financeable in the markets. Member countries' economies need to be competitive to avoid current account deficits which lead to debt crises. |
This requires prudent fiscal policies and structural reforms to
boost productivity. In spite of the Stability & Growth Pact,
peer pressure, exhortations by the ECB and the European
Commission and even the strictures of the bailout programmes, various member countries still failed to implement the
required fiscal and structural improvements. Hence the view taken that only rising bond yields ("bond vigilantes") are succeeding in getting governments to take action. Until the euro zone establishes enforceable fiscal rules, the bond vigilantes are considered to be required and financial markets remain unsettled, liable to erupt into turmoil. No break up The situation will have to get considerably worse than currently foreseeable for a country to leave the monetary union or for it to break up. The costs involved are high. Even severe austerity imposed on a weak country is preferable to the turmoil of exiting. For Greece only modest benefits beckon from devaluation. All euro zone countries are showing intense political commitment to monetary union, a stepping stone to eventual political union. A return to a fractured Europe will diminish Europe's stature in the world, lead it to be sidelined. Yet as the crisis continued to intensify, a break up could no longer be excluded. At least the exit of Greece is no longer a taboo for Europe's leaders. Special effort required this time Fiscal integration, centralising major tax and budget decisions, fiscal transfers from richer to poorer countries, issue of euro bonds are all seen as longer term projects, politically difficult or even impossible in the short run. Though after the failure of the measures decided at the 26-27 Oct'11 summit, and as the crisis dragged on, possibly precipitating a global recession, a special effort was undertaken, culminating in the ECB's extraordinary liquidity measures and the initiatives taken at the 8-9 Dec'11 summit. The new measurers, many believe, may once more fall short of providing a final solution. It may still be "just enough Europe". If so, yet more new measures will be forthcoming. For the survival of the monetary unions remains the top priority. For a detailed discussion see: Constitution: will it survive mark 2 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Background: budget
deficits move from
quiescence to calamity The euro zone entered the 2008-09 recession in a sound fiscal position. The budget deficit for the area as a whole amounted in 2007 to a modest 0.7% of GDP. Substantial growth in 2003-07 permitted the government coffers to be replenished after being drained by weak growth earlier in the decade. Deficits rose rapidly in 2008: to 2.1% of GDP. Initially it was hoped that the 2009 deficits could be contained within the 3% limit set by the Stability and Growth Pact. But as the severity of the recession became evident more and more fiscal reflationary measures were introduced and deficits soared. The "automatic stabilisers" further deepened the deficits as the recession curtailed tax inflows and boosted social support spending. The recovery of growth in 2010 brought an improvement. According to Eurostat's Nov'11 report the deficits of the euro area countries added up to a relatively bearable 6.2% of GDP in 2010, down from 6.4% in 2009. But the impact of the recession brought widely divergent country developments, triggering the sovereign debt crisis. Sovereign debt crisis brings tighter fiscal policies It was decided late in 2009 by the EU leaders that fiscal policy in 2010 would remain supportive of the recovery and that a start would only be made in 2011 to rein in the budget deficits. But the sovereign debt crisis which erupted early in 2010 in Greece and then spread to other deeply indebted countries forced these countries to introduce restrictive measure much earlier. The EU was thrown into its deepest crisis yet, necessitating emergency measures, much soul searching and fundamental changes in the EU's architecture. Bailout funds had to be created. |
Deficits to shrivel ? Declines in the deficits were expected over the 2011-12 period on the assumption that growth would strengthened and restrictive fiscal policies would be implemented in virtually all the euro zone countries. Deficits, according to the European Commission's autumn 2011 forecasts, were expected to amount to 4.1% of GDP in 2011, declining further to 3.4% in 2012 and 3.0% in 2013. Since growth has become negative, endangering deficit targets. Moreover reflationary measures may be required if unemployment rises excessively. New fiscal rules: "six pack", "fiscal compact" A new set of fiscal rules came into force 13 Dec'11 under the so-called "six pack" initiative. These aim to make the Stability & Growth Pact more effective by enhancing surveillance of budgets by the European Commission. The debt and deficit limits are the same as for Stability & Growth Pact (3% deficit, 60% deficit limit). Enforcement is to be enhanced through the imposition of fines (0.2% of GDP for euro zone members) and financial disincentives (suspension of cohesion funds for non members). Imposition to be "semi-automatic" through reverse qualified majority voting (i.e. a weighted majority in the Council has to oppose the imposition of the fine). The pact also includes a preventative arm which, for countries already respecting the 3% and 60% norms, is to ensure that spending plans do not endanger breaking the norms in future. The pact moreover includes an "excessive imbalance procedure" with surveillance and enforcement measures to correct imbalances subject to fines on non-compliance. This covers a wide range of macro economic variables such as current accounts, unit labour costs, unemployment, private sector debt. See Six Pack The European Commission made use of its enhanced powers for the first time shortly after 13 Dec by demanding restrictive measures by Belgium to ensure that the country achieved its 2012 deficit target of 2.8%. In addition a "fiscal compact" has been drawn up and will enter into force probably in 2013. See below. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Government debt by country:
from miniscule to perilously high The reference value of the government debt-to-GDP ratio laid down in the Maastricht Treaty is 60% of GDP. Only five countries currently satisfy this criterion, all countries with small populations, three of them recent members. A further two come quite close while the remaining ten are well over the limit, four with debt-to-GDP ratios exceeding 100%. Concerns about possible defaults of the most indebted countries have led to wide yield spreads between their government bonds and those of Germany. The average government debt for the euro zone for 2011 (as calculated by European Commission) is 88% of GDP, thus well over the reference value. This is up from a low of 66.3% achieved in 2007, the lowest result so far after a number of years of growth provided scope to "deflate" the debt. |
The deterioration is due to the
deep budget deficits resulting from
the 2008-09 recession. The
European Commission forecasts a further deterioration to
90.4% in 2012. By 2013 the debt is forecast to amount
to 91%. Greece stands out as the country with the heaviest debt and the second largest 2011 budget deficit (tables above). On the basis of unchanged policies Greece's debt will spiral out of control. Even under a severely restrictive fiscal regime only a slower rise in the debt can be achieved in the medium term. European Commission estimates that Greece's debt will rise to 198.5% in 2013. A debt restructuring is inevitable and is being attempted. The debt of Italy is also exceptionally high at 120% of GDP. The debts of Ireland and Portugal also now exceed 100%. |
|
When does a debt burden become unsustainable? It is difficult to
pinpoint in advance when a country's debt burden becomes
unsustainable. But its clear that it cannot rise forever. The debt burden is measured by the debt
stock/nominal GDP ratio. The stock of debt rises as the
government runs budget deficits while nominal GDP rises
as the economy grows and the price level rises. If the
debt rises faster than GDP, danger may lie ahead. |
The debt ratio jumped to 129 in 2009 and further to 145 in 2010. The steep rise in 2009 was
due to the (global) recession deepening the budget
deficit and the uncovering of hidden debt. Greece faced rapidly rising interest rates on its
borrowing which further deepened the budget deficit. Greece's partners in the euro zone and the IMF had to step in and provide it with the funds to cover its borrowing requirement for the 2010-12 years, initially at an interest rate of 5%, well below what Greece would have had to pay in the markets. The government introduced severe austerity measures, but failed to meet its targets and the debt burden is rising further, to 198 in 2013 (according to the European Commission). This is so high that the financial markets consider a debt restructuring inevitable. The EUR110bn loan granted to Greece in 2010 was to cover Greece's financial needs to mid-2012. In subsequent years its financial needs (repaying maturing loans, financing its running budget deficit) was estimated to amount to EUR60-70bn per year. With borrowing in the markets excluded Greece was forced to seek another bailout, this time amounting to EUR130bn. Problems abound. Granting Greece more funds is unpopular in the donor countries and may lead to voter revolt and moral hazard. The severe austerity regime imposed on Greece lead to demonstrations in the streets and political turmoil. Debt rescheduling may have a negative impact on the Europe's financial system as banks and other financial institutions (and the ECB) are major holders of Greek debt. A satisfactory solution remains to be found. |
|
Primary
Budget Balance required to stabilise debt A necessary condition to avoid a country's budget deficit "snowballing", i.e. deepening and eventually becoming un-financeable in the markets, is that the surplus on the primary budget (i.e. the budget minus interest payments on the government debt), (S), should be at least as high as the sum of the difference between the nominal interest rate (r) and the nominal growth rate of the economy (g) times the ratio of government debt/GDP (D): S ≥ (r - g) D see De Grauwe. See also Gross and Alcidi, "Adjustment Difficulties and Debt Overhangs in the Eurozone Periphery", May 2011. |
The formula has been applied to selected
countries in the tables below. The calculations are very sensitive to
the rate of interest a country has to pay on its government debt. The
higher the interest rate the bigger a primary surplus required to
prevent snowballing (and vice versa). The calculations are equally sensitive to growth. The weaker nominal growth, the bigger the surplus required (and vice versa). The interest rate the bailed out countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal) had to pay prior to the bailout rose so high that the snowball effect made the debt unbearable. The subsidised rate they currently pay removes this obstacle. But the austerity imposed has reduced growth, worsening the second element in the equation. The bailed out countries still have a mountain to climb. The other vulnerable countries have become more vulnerable in H2'11 as interest rates have risen and growth slowed (France, Italy, Belgium and Spain). In contrast the UK and the US have become less vulnerable as their bond yields dropped. |
|
Country notes based on Nov'11 data |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The table right is based on the data for
Nov'11. The results are highly sensitive to the bond yield and the nominal GDP
growth rate. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BACKGROUND
|
From "No Bailout"
to Fiscal Compact |
As solvency fears spread
to other deeply indebted south European countries, Spain, Italy and
Portugal announced new austerity measures.
In order to counter the intensifying pressures on the euro zone's
financial system the EU drew up a EUR750bn package of measures
during the week-end of 8-9 May'10 after intensive and divisive
emergency negotiations (details below). |
|
European Union's financial support packages of May'10 European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF): Euro zone governments in May'10 created a "special purpose vehicle" (SPV) which could raise up to EUR440bn in the markets in the form of loans guaranteed by all euro zone countries.
|
European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM): A EUR60bn rapid reaction stabilisation fund was also created in May'10, controlled by the European Commission and modelled on, and in addition to, the "balance of payments facility" hitherto used to aid EU members not part of the euro zone.
IMF
contribution: The IMF contributes one euro to the aid
package for every two euros contributed by the EU. On the
assumption that the EU package amounts to EUR500bn (EUR440bn +
EUR60bn), the IMF's
contribution amounts to EUR250bn. |
|
Mar'11 summits: euro zone leaders
reach agreement in principle about measures
to cope with sovereign debt crises Result of summits was ahead
of initial market expectations, but left some essential details to be
agreed. The
measures required formal approval by all euro zone members.
|
Long term measures
|
|
21 Jul'11 measures: second bail out for Greece A second bailout for Greece was agreed with a major contribution from the private sector and a "Marshall Aid" plan to rehabilitate the economy. The bailout terms for all the bailed out countries were softened (lower interest rates, longer repayment periods). Greece is to be provided with EUR159 of new aid. This sum is to include a EUR50bn contribution from Greek bond holders which resulted in the rating agency Fitch declaring Greece in restrictive default. ECB said that it will nevertheless continue to accept Greek bonds as collateral after euro zone governments provided guarantees, backing Greek bonds up to a value of EUR35bn. |
The operations of the bailout funds (EFSF, ESM) are being extended, permitting buying bonds in secondary markets, recapitalise banks and offer IMF style precautionary credit lines. The Stability & Growth Pact and macro economic surveillance is to be strengthened. National fiscal frameworks are to be introduced by end 2012. The measures were poorly received by the financial markets as not providing a solution to the sovereign debt crisis. The the bond yields of the most indebted countries continued to rise. Specifically Italian and Spanish bonds came under intense selling pressure. The agreement remains to be ratified by parliaments. |
|
26-27 Oct'11 summit: definite solution sought ..... The 26-27 Oct summit of euro zone leaders ended with agreement on various measures to diffuse the debt crisis by providing liquidity to counties finding it difficult to borrow in the markets:
Much of the detail remained to be decided.
The initial reaction of markets was favourable. |
..... but not attained The summit sought a longer lasting solution to the debt crisis. The measures announced briefly boosted the EUR, stock markets and the bonds of the indebted countries. But markets soon had second thoughts and the crisis intensified. It has become clear that the revamped EFSF bailout fund will not dispose of enough resources, even if leveraged, to cover the potential needs of Italy and Spain. The process of achieving leverage soon revealed itself to be complicated and only modest success beckoned. Cash rich developing countries, such as China, indicated little interest. Finance ministers were hoping to present the leveraged EFSF in Dec'11. Markets further consider that the EUR106bn recapitalisation of banks fell short of what was required. Analysts generally considered a much larger recapitalisation essential. Also the 50% write down on Greek bonds was seen insufficient to restore the country to solvency. It was widely believed that only the ECB could provide sufficient resources to cope with the financial needs of the indebted euro zone countries. So far Germany and the ECB itself have refused, fearing governments would relax corrective measures once bond yields back at affordable levels. Early in week 44 the unexpected announcement that Greek PM Papandreou was to call a referendum on Greece's aid package caused panic in the markets. A "no" could have led to a disorderly default of Greek debt. The exit of Greece from the monetary union was for the first time officially seen as possible. The referendum was then cancelled, followed by a government of national unity under ex-ECB vice president PM Papademos. Focus then shifted to Italy and Spain as these countries' bond yields rose to unsustainable levels. In Italy a technocrat government under ex-European commissioner PM Monty took over from Berlusconi. In Spain the centre-right Popular Party won the Nov'11 elections and formally took over from the defeated Socialists on 13 Dec. |
|
8-9 Dec'11 summit: definite solution sought ..... At the EU summit of 8-9 Dec'11 another attempt was made to "solve" the debt crisis. This after the failure of the measures of the 26-27 Oct'11 summit, which was followed by a wave of selling of euro zone government bonds focused on Italy, Spain and France, even at one stage drawing Bunds into the melee. Measures decided were at lower range of what could have been expected. Emphasis remained on imposing austerity on problem countries with tighter deficit rules. But resources available for bailouts were substantially increased. After an initial bounce, markets gave summit package the thumbs down. Measures:
|
..... results seen to fall short with legal hurdles and
implementation risk Difficulties ahead, implementation not assured:
|
Primary Budget Balance required to stabilise debt in 2012
|
simplified table |
|||
|
Selected country |
S Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt |
Expected primary budget balance in 2012 surplus (+), deficit (-) |
Required change to primary budget balance 2012 |
| Spain | 3.2 | -3.5 | 6.7 |
| Greece subsidised rate | 6.7 | 1.0 | 5.7 |
| Ireland subsidised rate | 1.4 | -4.3 | 5.7 |
| Portugal subsidised rate | 5.4 | 0.8 | 4.6 |
|
simplified table |
|||
|
Selected country |
S Required primary budget balance to stabilise the debt |
Expected primary budget balance in 2012 surplus (+), deficit (-) |
Required change to primary budget balance 2012 |
| France | 1.2 | -2.5 | 3.7 |
| Belgium | 1.8 | -1.3 | 3.1 |
| Italy | 6.1 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| for comparison: | |||
| UK | -1.3 | -4.6 | 3.3 |
| US | -1.4 | -5.4 | 4.0 |
|
|
||||||
|
Selected country |
r |
g Nominal GDP growth expected for 2011 % |
D Government debt/GDP ratio* |
S Required primary budget balance: % of GDP |
Expected primary budget balance 2011* surplus (+), deficit (-) % of GDP |
Required change to primary budget balance ** % of GDP |
| Germany | 3.06 | 4.5 | 0.824 | -1.2 | 0.4 | -1.6 |
| France | 3.49 | 4.0 | 0.847 | -0.4 | -3.1 | 2.7 |
| Italy | 4.76 | 2.7 | 1.203 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.7 |
| Belgium | 4.21 | 4.5 | 0.97 | -0.3 | -0.4 | 0.1 |
| Spain | 5.32 | 2.0 | 0.681 | 2.3 | -4.1 | 6.4 |
| Greece | 15.94 | -3.5 | 1.577 | 30.7 | -2.8 | 33.5 |
| subsidised rate | 5 | " | " | 13.4 | " | 16.2 |
| Portugal | 9.63 | -1.5 | 1.017 | 11.3 | -1.7 | 13.0 |
| subsidised rate | 5 | " | " | 6.6 | " | 8.3 |
| Ireland | 10.64 | 1.5 | 1.120 | 10.2 | -6.8 | 17.0 |
| subsidised rate | 5.8 | " | " | 4.8 | " | 11.6 |
| for comparison: | ||||||
| UK | 3.49 | 3.7 | 0.842 | -0.2 | -5.5 | 5.3 |
| US | 3.15 | 4.5 | 1.200 | -1.6 | -7.1 | 5.5 |
|
* Source: European Commission, European
Economic Forecast, Spring 2011 **This results from the previous two columns: the required primary budget balance and the actual (estimated) balance for 2011. Only in Germany does the actual balance exceed the required balance. In the other countries listed the two have to be added. |
||||||
|
|